01 · The problem
A feature nobody used
Cubo Itaú connects large companies with startups. Events, business challenges and connections generate data no other platform has. The plan was to offer member companies an innovation management feature inside Cubo, and the first attempt, shaped as an innovation funnel, got no traction.
My starting point: before redesigning the funnel, understand why it had not worked.
I keep everything under control: how many people joined events, how many visited Cubo, room bookings, all in the spreadsheet.
Innovation lead at a mining company, round 1
02 · Round 1 · Oct 2025
Why the funnel failed, and what they actually needed
I interviewed innovation leads at five companies, in automotive, food, mining, energy and agribusiness, to understand how they manage open innovation and why Cubo's funnel had not caught on. Of five hypotheses, four were validated and one partly.
I mapped the companies by maturity, and the picture was clear: mature companies already have a tool; less mature ones live in spreadsheets.
AutomotiveHigh
FoodHigh
EnergyMedium-high
AgribusinessLow-medium
MiningLow, evolving
The reason showed up quickly. Most companies already had a robust tool of their own to manage the funnel, would not swap it for Cubo's, and saw no value in keeping two. But the same conversations showed something else: what they wanted was to see their own innovation through data only Cubo has, such as events, challenges, connections and visits.
What was asked forAn innovation management funnel inside Cubo.
→
What they neededA 360º view of their innovation, built on internal data only Cubo has.
The signal was in their routine: every month, member companies asked the Cubo team for a table report with these numbers.
Companies already have a place to innovate. What they lack is a Cubo that centralizes, connects and turns this data into value.
Decision 1Replace the funnel with a 360º view built on Cubo data
- Evidence
- Mature companies already use robust tools of their own and would not switch. Less mature ones need visibility, not another system. And all of them asked every month for a report only Cubo could put together.
- What I ruled out
- Redesigning the funnel to compete with the tools they already use.
- Trade-off
- Cubo stops trying to be the management system and becomes the layer of visibility and value for the relationship.
The recommendation became four fronts: 360º dashboards (interactions, connections, ROI, events), a standardized startup base, simple integrations and AI to fill in profiles and improve search and matching. That last seed would come back later, in Cubo AI.